Sometimes I read books. Sometimes I read books that are prescribed to be read by professors. When I do read the books, and well enough to understand them, I really appreciate it. I think... But the book I've been reading for environmental ethics class is really worth it. While it's confusing and sometimes super technical, it does make me think. Surprise surprise. Yes, I can do that sometimes. But now I was seriously thinking.
Back in the day, when countries set out to 'colonize' places, what made them think when they landed on a new land, sometimes even seeing people there already, that this was now their land? They claimed land already claimed. Power and winners write history, right? They also decide who owns what and who can own what others already own. Winning has a different meaning in countries that feel they are better, more modern, more forward, and just generally the country.
Those that landed in a country that seemed uninhabited soon afterwards found people. It was rarely the feeling of being completely alone. It was never really: we landed in some empty land that is absolutely ours. It was rarely ever completely empty. Say, America. The Indians were there, right? So what made all the countries believe they could rip it apart, take the land, lock up the people? What makes it alright and how could we accept that so readily? It underlines the whole egocentric idea that we're trying to shake. So many countries are guilty of such a move. France, Italy, Germany, Sweden, England, the US, etc etc. Oh wait, what's that? The Western countries? Yes, look at that. The Western countries are especially guilty of this and it's just been accepted. I don't know what to do about it now, what we are guilty of as individuals, but please think about it next time you disrespect people, foreigners, locals, or natives.
Maybe they're not so different from you?
Pictures from weheartit.com